Walter L. Nead v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter L. NEAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35555. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Walter L. Nead appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The Secretary denied Nead's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33 , 1381-1383(c). Nead argues that: 1) substantial evidence does not support the Secretary's finding that Nead is not disabled, and 2) the administrative law judge erred by denying Nead's request for the issuance of subpoenas. 3 We AFFIRM. 4 "To determine whether substantial evidence exists we look at…