Vitelio Ospitia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vitelio OSPITIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70765. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 12, 1996. Decided May 1, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and TRIMBLE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Vitelio Ospitia ("Ospitia"), a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an order denying him suspension of deportation under section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1). Ospitia argues that the BIA erred in concluding that he had not demonstrated that deportation would result in extreme hardship. We reject Ospitia's arguments, and accordingly we deny review. 4 The BIA's comprehensive opinion carefully considered all the relevant factors of extreme hardship in the record, and further…