Peiffer v. Norblad

Good Law
89 F.3d 846·1996 WL 217891·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34838
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199695-35851California288 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul J. PEIFFER; Katherine J. Peiffer; Robert J. Skirving; Melissa T. Skirving; Michael E. Stewart, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Albin W. NORBLAD; Richard D. Barber; James McLaughlin; Theodore R. Kulongoski; Kerry Barnett; Kimball L. Wallis; Willie Bose; Oregon State Bar, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35851. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Peiffer and others appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Washington County, Oregon Deputy Sheriffs Willie Bose and Theodore Evans and others in Peiffer's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the plaintiffs were arrested without a warrant or probable cause. 3 Peiffer contends that the district judge should have recused himself because he is a member of the Oregon State Bar Association, a named defendant. "The fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.