Josefa Ana Osorio-Delgado Orlando Jose Baltodano-Osorio v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
89 F.3d 846·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34842
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199695-70437California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Josefa Ana OSORIO-DELGADO; Orlando Jose Baltodano-Osorio, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Josefa Ana Osorio-Delgado and her son Orlando Jose Baltodano-Osorio, natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the order of an immigration judge ("IJ"), denying their request for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). We review the BIA's decision for substantial evidence. See Acewicz v. INS, 984 F.2d 1056, 1061 (9th Cir.1993). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and deny the petitions for review.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.