United States v. Rose Boyles, Aka: Rose E. Boyles Euranye Mince Rose D. Mincey

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rose BOYLES, aka: Rose E. Boyles; Euranye Mince; Rose D. Mincey, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50461. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1996. Decided June 27, 1996. 1 Before: WIGGINS, THOMPSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Rose Boyles was convicted of mail fraud, false claims, false statements, and use of a false social security number. She was sentenced to 33 months and ordered to pay $83,288 restitution to the Post Office. She argues for the first time on appeal that: 4 1) the district court lacked statutory authority to order restitution to the Post Office; 2) the court improperly ordered restitution for losses that were not directly caused by the conduct underlying her counts of conviction; and 3) the court miscalculated Boyles's offense level under the fraud and deceit Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1. 5 We…