Cathryn Gia Thomas v. The Municipality of Anchorage Anchorage Telephone Utility

89 F.3d 846 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Cathryn Gia THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE; Anchorage Telephone Utility, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35380. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Cathryn Gia Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action for failure to comply with numerous district court orders. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f), 37(b)(2)(C) and 41(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Thomas contends that the district court should not have considered her failure to comply with the district court's orders during the time she was proceeding pro se when dismissing her action. This contention lacks merit. 4 We review a district court's dismissal of an action for failure to comply with a district court order under an abuse…