United States v. Alfredo Campos-Padilla

Good Law
89 F.3d 847·1996 WL 218182·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34946
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199695-10293California2,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 847 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo CAMPOS-PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10293. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: THOMPSON, KLEINFELD and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfredo Campos-Padilla appeals his conviction after jury trial for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). After careful consideration of the numerous assertions of error presented, we affirm. 3 * Campos-Padilla was the passenger in a silver pickup truck containing approximately 200 pounds of marijuana. After border patrol agents pulled over the truck, Campos-Padilla unsuccessfully tried to evade apprehension by leading the agents on a foot chase. He first contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress all evidence gleaned after the border patrol agents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.