Crisp
Crisp v. Gourley
32 F. App'x 382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 2002No. 01-16808; D.C. No. CV-01-05547-OWWCalifornia83 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Matthew R. Crisp appeals pro se the district court’s decision to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for relief. Because Crisp filed his notice of appeal one day late, we lack jurisdiction. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1) (2001).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.