United States v. Ignacio Acosta Torres, United States of America v. Benjamin Corral, United States of America v. Francisco Carbajal Arias

Good Law
89 F.3d 847·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34927
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 199695-10245California2,687 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 847 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ignacio Acosta TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin CORRAL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco Carbajal ARIAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-10245, 95-10248, 95-10260 and 95-10252. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 16, 1996. * Decided June 25, 1996. 1 Before: PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge ** . 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The appellants challenge their convictions for playing various roles in a criminal enterprise devoted to the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine. 4 We affirm. 5 * Ignacio Acosta-Torres was charged in a second superseding indictment with conspiring to manufacture, distribute, and possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute (Count II), distributing methamphetamine (Count III), and possessing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.