United States v. Paul F. Soares

89 F.3d 847 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul F. SOARES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10359. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Paul F. Soares appeals pro se his 12-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . Soares contends that the district court erred by (1) imposing an employment restriction as a condition of supervised release, and (2) ordering that his sentence run consecutive to an unexpired federal sentence. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a) and we affirm. 1 3 Soares contends that the district court erred by imposing as a condition of supervised release that Soares not be employed in a position of fiduciary responsibility without permission of his probation officer. We…