Jose Servando Veloz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
89 F.3d 848 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Servando VELOZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70944. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1996. * Decided June 10, 1996. 1 Before: BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Jose Servando Veloz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge's (IJ) denial of his application for discretionary relief from deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1005a(a), and we deny the petition. 4 Section 212(c) permits the Attorney General to grant discretionary relief from deportation to lawful permanent residents. In deciding whether to grant section 212(c) relief, the BIA must consider the social and…