United States v. Raymond Allen Weaver, Alyce Weaver, Claimant-Appellant

Good Law
89 F.3d 848·1996 WL 217927·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 35003
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199695-30333California772 words

Opinion

Opinion

89 F.3d 848 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Allen WEAVER, Defendant, Alyce Weaver, Claimant-Appellant. No. 95-30333. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 29, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alyce F. Weaver appeals pro se the district court order dismissing her 21 U.S.C. § 853 (n) action in which she claimed a third-party interest in her husband's real property that was forfeited to the United States after his drug conviction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 This court reviews de novo the district court's interpretation of federal forfeiture law. United States v. 1980 Lear Jet, Model 35A, Serial No. 277, 38 F.3d 398, 400 (9th Cir.1994). This court also reviews de novo the disposition of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.