UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
90 F.3d 1420·96 Daily Journal DAR 8821·1996 WL 409169·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18147·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5419
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 199695-10304California4,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

Kevin James Collins was convicted by jury of being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C, § 922(g)(1), and sentenced to prison. He raises six issues on appeal: (1) his indictment should have been dismissed because he was not brought to trial within the 180-day time limit of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IADA), 18 U.S.C. App. II; (2) the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence that Collins burglarized a business shortly before his arrest, and that after his arrest he persuaded others to create a cover-up story about the gun; (3) his Sixth Amendment confrontation rights were violated because the district court limited the scope of his cross-examination of a government witness; (4) the district court erred by adding .two points to his offense level for obstruction of justice; (5) the district court erred by adding four points to his offense level for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony offense; and (6) the prosecutor violated Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), by striking two Hispanic potential jurors.

We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The government’s sole charge against Collins was that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.