Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,282, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5415, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8834 Stanley Knapp, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Whinney, Stanley Knapp, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Philip J. Gomez Douglas J. O'connor, Stanley Knapp, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Philip J. Gomez Douglas J. O'COnnOr Ernst & Whinney
Opinion
Opinion
90 F.3d 1431 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,282, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5415 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8834 Stanley KNAPP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ERNST & WHINNEY, Defendant-Appellant. Stanley KNAPP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip J. GOMEZ; Douglas J. O'Connor, Defendants-Appellants. Stanley KNAPP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip J. GOMEZ; Douglas J. O'Connor; Ernst & Whinney, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-56379, 94-56380 and 94-56381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1996 (94-56379). Submitted Feb. 6, 1996 (94-56380 & 94-56381). * Decided July 23, 1996. Peter H. Benzian, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, California; Daniel M. Gray, Ernst & Young, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Leonard B. Simon and Dennis Stewart, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, San Diego, California, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Douglas J. O'Connor, Huntington Beach, California, pro se. Philip J. Gomez, Incline Village, Nevada, pro se. Appeals from the…