UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melbourne SHAW, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
91 F.3d 86·96 Daily Journal DAR 9320·1996 WL 428508·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18876·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5681
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 199695-50193California1,449 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

Melborne Shaw pled guilty to all three counts of the first superseding indictment: (1) conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 ; (2) armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (d); and (3) use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Shaw appeals his sentence. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I. Background.

On October 14, 1994, appellant Shaw, Paul Gray, Sean Howard, and a juvenile committed an armed bank robbery of the Beckman Employee Credit Union (“credit union”) in Azusa, California. All four robbers entered the credit union, armed with firearms. During the robbery, co-conspirator Howard, who was the getaway driver, left. Without a getaway vehicle, the remaining robbers, including appellant, carjacked a credit union customer whose car was in the parking lot. A police pursuit ensued with speeds in excess of 100 miles per hour at some points of the twenty-one mile chase. While Gray drove the vehicle, Shaw and the juvenile fired shots at the police ears. Two police cars were hit by bullets. The robbers in the carjacked car also sideswiped…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.