Cabrera-Arias

United States v. Cabrera-Arias

Good Law
32 F. App'x 478
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 2002No. 00-50654; D.C. No. CR-00-00434-JMCalifornia245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Orlando Cabrera-Arias appeals the thirty-six month mandatory minimum sentence imposed following his guilty plea to bringing aliens into the United States for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(2)(B)(ii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Cabrera-Arias contends that his three-year mandatory minimum sentence violates the Eighth Amendment because it exceeds the applicable sentencing guideline range, and because there is no safety valve provision. Because Cabrera-Arias raises this claim for the first time on appeal, we review only for plain error, see United States v. Vences, 169 F.3d 611, 613 (9th Cir.1999), and find none.

Cabrera-Arias offers no support for his assertion that there is a constitutional right to the establishment of a safety valve for a three-year mandatory minimum sentence. Congress’ determination that a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(2)(B)(ii) warrants a three to ten year sentence does not violate the Eighth Amendment. See United States v. Harris, 154 F.3d 1082, 1084 (9th Cir.1998) (finding a 95-year mandatory minimum sentence for five counts of armed robbery did not violate the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.