Camilo Antonio Castillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

91 F.3d 150 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Camilo Antonio CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70575. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Camilo Antonio Castillo, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming a decision of the Immigration Judge ("IJ") denying Castillo's request for suspension of deportation under section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1), and voluntary departure under section 244(e)(1) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (e)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 3 Castillo contends that the BIA erred by denying his request for suspension of deportation because the BIA failed to consider the…