Seyed Hojjad Azimi-Osmavandani Maryam Seddigh-Abdullahi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
91 F.3d 150·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36635
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 199695-70090California633 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 150 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Seyed Hojjad AZIMI-OSMAVANDANI; Maryam Seddigh-Abdullahi, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70090. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1996. Decided July 2, 1996. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges and FITZGERALD, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Petitioners Seyed Hojjad Azimi-Osmavandani (hereinafter, "Azimi") and Maryam Seddigh-Abdullahi seek review of the BIA's denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) & 1253(h), and their motion to remand for consideration of their application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a). We deny the petition for review. I. 4 We review the factual findings underlying the BIA's denial of asylum and withholding of deportation for substantial evidence. Arteaga v. INS, 836 F.2d 1227, 1228 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.