Ruby Castaneda v. City of Tempe Tempe Police Dept. Officer, Larry Wylie, in His Individual and Official Capacity

91 F.3d 150 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruby CASTANEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF TEMPE; Tempe Police Dept.; Officer, Larry Wylie, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudy Castaneda appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging violations of the First Amendment, as well as the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. He also appeals from the district court's dismissal of pendant state law claims and denial of his motion to alter the judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 As to the dismissal of all federal law claims with prejudice, we affirm for…