In re Consolidated Pioneer Mortg. Entities

91 F.3d 151 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re CONSOLIDATED PIONEER MORTGAGE ENTITIES, a/k/a Pioneer Liquidating Corp., Debtor. Burk N. ASHFORD; Theresa T. Ashford, Appellants, v. NAIMCO, INC., a/k/a Pioneer Mortgage, n/k/a Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage Entities, a/k/a Pioneer Liquidating Corp., Appellees. No. 95-55491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Burk and Theresa Ashford appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's decision to disallow the Ashfords' claim in full against Consolidated Pioneer Mortgage Entities' ("Pioneer") estate arising from Pioneer's rejection of a purported executory contract which allegedly gave the Ashfords the right to purchase real property from Pioneer. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm. 3 We…