Fieler v. Chrysler Corp.

91 F.3d 151 1996-2 Trade Cases P 71,589 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Margaret FIELER; James J. Fieler; Aggressive Innovative Marketing, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Delaware corp.; Bozell Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 15, 1996. Decided July 29, 1996. 1 Before: ALARCON, BEEZER AND RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Margaret and James Fieler, and Aggressive Innovative Marketing, Inc. (collectively "the Fielers"), appeal the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their action against Chrysler Corporation, Inc. and Bozell, Inc. The Fielers' amended complaint alleges that Chrysler and Bozell violated federal and California antitrust laws, as well as other California laws. We have jurisdiction, and we affirm. 4 * Review of a 12(b)(6) order of dismissal requires us to accept the facts…