Ali Escobar-Chavez Vilma Ena Del Carmen Soriano-Soza De Escobar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

91 F.3d 151 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ali ESCOBAR-CHAVEZ; Vilma Ena Del Carmen Soriano-Soza De Escobar, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70076. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 13, 1996. * Decided July 8, 1996. 1 Before: REINHARDT and HALL, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The petitioners, who are husband and wife, seek review of an order denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). 1 The Board of Immigrations Appeals' ("BIA") denial of their applications is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a different conclusion. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 n. 1 (1992) (noting that to reverse the BIA's decision we must find that the evidence compels a different result); Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 338 (9th Cir.1995). Therefore, we deny the…