Langley v. Fidel

91 F.3d 152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Virgil H. LANGLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noel FIDEL; Rudolph J. Gerber; Sarah Grant; Hugh E. Hegyi; Laurie Herman; Jerry Holt; William J. Schafer III; Joe Sotelo; Roy Tanney; Grant Woods; Arizona Department of Real Estate, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17166. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 7, 1996. * Decided July 18, 1996. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Virgil Langley appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action, which he brought after failing in state court to overturn an adverse administrative ruling restricting his right to subdivide and sell property. Langley contends that the state judges, state attorneys, and employees of the Arizona Department of Real Estate acted unlawfully to deprive him of his right to own and dispose of his property. We affirm. 3 The district court correctly observed that Langley's federal…