In Re William A. Knauss, Debtor. Fred R. Kartchner Beverly Kartchner v. William A. Knauss, Debtor-Appellant

91 F.3d 152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re William A. KNAUSS, Debtor. Fred R. KARTCHNER; Beverly Kartchner, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William A. KNAUSS, Debtor-Appellant. No. 95-17375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Debtor William A. Knauss ("Debtor") appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his appeal from the bankruptcy court's remand of an action to state court. We affirm. 3 Here, the bankruptcy court remanded a state court action of Fred and Beverly Kartchner ("Kartchners") for lack of federal jurisdiction. 1 The issue on appeal, therefore, is whether the bankruptcy court's non-discretionary remand, which is not barred from review by 28 U.S.C. § 1452 (b) 2 , is nonetheless barred from review by the general removal provision as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (d). We have stated: 4…