Stephen Joseph Herlihy v. Bdm Management Services Company, Bdm International, Inc., and Does 1-50, Inclusive

91 F.3d 152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephen Joseph HERLIHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BDM MANAGEMENT SERVICES COMPANY, BDM International, Inc., and Does 1-50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55214. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1996. * Decided July 29, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 The Appellant in this action, Stephen James Herlihy, asserted in his Complaint that the Appellees, BDM International, Inc., BDM Management Services Company, and John Does 1-50 (collectively, "BDM") retaliatorily and wrongfully terminated him from his employment with BDM Management Services Company because of his threat to report the illegal time-keeping practices of his employer, because he is a Christian, and because of his age. Herlihy also asserted that BDM breached his employment contract. 4 The district court granted summary judgment to BDM on…