Shirley Jones Ingels Marty Ingels v. A. David Harris

91 F.3d 152 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shirley Jones INGELS; Marty Ingels, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. A. David HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-55960. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A. David Harris, a disbarred attorney, appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) dismissal, without prejudice, of Shirley Jones Ingels' and Marty Ingels' ("the Ingels") action alleging fraud and numerous other civil causes of action. Harris has been convicted of defrauding the Ingels and is currently incarcerated. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Harris first contends that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing the action "without prejudice." This contention lacks merit. 4 "The district court's determination of the terms and conditions of dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P.…