Marjorie Mauri v. General Electric Plastics, a Division of General Electric Corporation

91 F.3d 153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marjorie MAURI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC PLASTICS, A DIVISION OF GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-56139. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marjorie Mauri appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her action against her former employer, General Electric Plastics ("GE Plastics"), concerning her exposure to toxic fumes while operating a photocopy machine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Mauri contends that the district court erred by setting aside an entry of default against GE Plastics because GE Plastics failed to show good cause pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(c). This contention lacks merit. 4 We review the district court's order setting aside an entry of default for abuse of discretion. See…