In Re James Cy Mouradick, Debtor. W. Bartley Anderson v. James Cy Mouradick

Good Law
91 F.3d 153·1996 WL 387653·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36927
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 199695-15103California1,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re James Cy MOURADICK, Debtor. W. Bartley ANDERSON, Appellant, v. James Cy MOURADICK, Appellee. No. 95-15103. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1996. * Decided July 10, 1996. 1 Before: T.G. NELSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Attorney W. Bartley Anderson appeals from a decision of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming a bankruptcy court order. The order enjoined Anderson from pursuing certain state court litigation against the debtor, James Cy Mouradick, and awarded attorney's fees to Mouradick. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm the injunction, vacate the fee award, and remand. 4 * We reject Anderson's argument that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to enter judgment. His contention that the state court lawsuit does not concern the bankruptcy estate goes more to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.