Patricia A. McColm Cross-Appellee v. California State University Trustees

91 F.3d 153 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Patricia A. McCOLM, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY TRUSTEES, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 92-16913, 92-16934. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1996. * Decided July 5, 1996. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Patricia McColm appeals pro se the district court's judgment in favor of California State University Trustees ("CSU") on her claims of gender discrimination and discriminatory retaliation. CSU cross-appeals, arguing that the district court erred in amending its judgment to state that CSU violated California Education Code § 89546. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm the district court's judgment against McColm, reverse the district court's amendment of the judgment and remand for entry of judgment for CSU. 3 * McColm challenges the district court's findings and…