Regonald D. Phillips v. Ernest Palubicki Michael Peters Lawrence Marquez

91 F.3d 154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Regonald D. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest PALUBICKI; Michael Peters; Lawrence Marquez, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55507. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Regonald D. Phillips, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment following a jury verdict in favor of correctional officers Ernest Palubicki, Michael Peters, and Lawrence Marquez (collectively "defendants") in Phillips's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants used excessive force during an altercation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Here, the district court granted the defendants' motion in limine to exclude "[a]ny complaints of misconduct, investigation of these complaints, any discipline imposed as a result of…