Ronald Sneed v. James Gomez William Merkle D. Brazil C. Beckman G.P. Douglas H. Orr, Ronald Sneed v. D. Kelsey D. Renauld T. Lemke M. Music G. Higgins, H. Orr R. Lasher L. Martinez, Sr., Ronald Sneed v. M. Music G. Higgins R. Zimmerman R. Martinez, Sr. D. Kelsey T. Brewer T. Lemke D. Blankenship J. Gomez W. Clegg R.L. Howell Rene Hill W. Merkley S. Bollinger

91 F.3d 154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald SNEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ; William Merkle; D. Brazil; C. Beckman; G.P. Douglas; H. Orr, Defendants-Appellees. Ronald SNEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D. KELSEY; D. Renauld; T. Lemke; M. Music; G. Higgins, H. Orr; R. Lasher; L. Martinez, Sr., Defendants-Appellees. Ronald SNEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M. MUSIC; G. Higgins; R. Zimmerman; R. Martinez, Sr.; D. Kelsey; T. Brewer; T. Lemke; D. Blankenship; J. Gomez; W. Clegg; R.L. Howell; Rene Hill; W. Merkley; S. Bollinger, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-16298, 95-16652 and 95-16673. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , federal prisoner Ronald Sneed filed three complaints for damages claiming that prison officials had unconstitutionally deprived him of thirty days of…