Presley v. United States

91 F.3d 154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward L. PRESLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; U.S. Department of Interior; Bureau of Land Management; Secretary of Interior, Bruce Babbitt; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Forest Service and Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17035. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward L. Presley, appeals pro se the district court's (1) dismissal of his actions brought against the United States Department of Agriculture, the Forest Service, and the Secretary of Agriculture (collectively "Department of Agriculture defendants") and (2) the district court's summary judgment for the Bureau of Land Management and the Secretary of the Department of the Interior. Department of the Interior ("DOI"). Presley challenged the Bureau of…