Souch

91 F.3d 154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gerald C. SOUCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BEAVER, COS; Curran, COS, # 2562, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15866. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Gerald C. Souch appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Souch's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated the Eighth Amendment by failing to stop another inmate from attacking him when he was in the prison law library. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Wallis v. Baldwin, 70 F.3d 1074, 1076 (9th Cir.1995). Summary judgment is appropriate if the opposing party only presents conclusory allegations unsupported by factual data, see Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th…