New York, New York Hotel, LLC v. Vincent Panetta

Good Law
91 F.3d 154·1996 WL 368140·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 199696-15247California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 154 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NEW YORK, NEW YORK HOTEL, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Vincent PANETTA, et al., Defendants/Appellants. No. 96-15247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an appeal from the district court's preliminary injunction order in plaintiff corporation's trademark infringement action below. 9th Cir.R. 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting preliminary injunctive relief. See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002 , 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995). The record before us fails to support appellants' assertions that the district court relied on erroneous legal premises or improperly balanced the plaintiff's likelihood of success on the merits with the possibility of irreparable harm.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.