Jesus Torres v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

91 F.3d 155 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesus TORRES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 96-70006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jesus Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision denying his application for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a). Torres contends the BIA erred by affirming the immigration judge's finding that deportation would not result in extreme hardship to him and his three- and six-year-old sons. We deny the petition for review. 3 Eligibility for suspension of deportation requires a showing of extreme hardship. 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(1). "[E]conomic detriment, without more, does not amount to extreme hardship." Ramirez-Gonzalez v. INS, 695 F.2d 1208, 1211…