United States v. Douglas P. Blankenship

91 F.3d 155 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas P. BLANKENSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30305. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996 * . Decided July 3, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Douglas P. Blankenship appeals pro se the district court's order granting the government's post judgment motion following his guilty plea conviction for racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c). Blankenship contends that the district court erred by granting the government's motion to apply $707 seized from Blankenship toward restitution and to destroy two seized firearms. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm in part, and reverse in part. 3 "A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure or by the deprivation of property may move the district court for the district in which the…