United States v. Chleora Kay Bergquist, United States of America v. Sandra Vee Belisle, United States of America v. Merton Ernest Greif

91 F.3d 155 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chleora Kay BERGQUIST, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sandra Vee BELISLE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Merton Ernest GREIF, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-30249, 95-30250 and 95-30272. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1996. Decided July 3, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and LEGGE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendants Chleora Bergquist, Sandra Belisle, and Merton Greif challenge their convictions and sentences on five counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 1343, and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 1343. CHALLENGES TO THE CONVICTIONS I. 4 Defendants raise several evidentiary contentions on appeal, which we review for abuse of discretion. See…