United States v. Lee Anne Dorothy Hanson, Aka: Leeanne Dorothy Hanson Aka: Leeanne D. Hanson Aka: T/n: Leanne Dorthy Knowles
Opinion
Opinion
91 F.3d 156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Anne Dorothy HANSON, aka: Leeanne Dorothy Hanson; aka: Leeanne D. Hanson; aka: t/n: Leanne Dorthy Knowles, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50289. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Defendant-appellant Lee Anne Dorothy Hanson ("Hanson") pled guilty to aiding and abetting the making of false statements in a loan application in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1014. The district court sentenced her to 18 months incarceration, applying the 1993 version of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"). On appeal, Hanson contends that the 1989 Guidelines should have been used to determine her sentence, as it was that version which was in effect at the time the crime was committed. Hanson raises for the first time…