United States v. Enrique Juarez-Moreno

91 F.3d 156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique JUAREZ-MORENO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-30017. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Enrique Juarez-Moreno appeals his conviction following his conditional guilty plea to possession of heroin with intent to distribute and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Juarez-Moreno contends that in denying his motion to suppress evidence, the district court erred by finding that he voluntarily consented to the warrantless search of two apartments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In reviewing the voluntariness of a suspect's consent to enter and to search a home, we consider whether under the totality of the circumstances, the…