United States v. Terry Erwin Eyler

Good Law
91 F.3d 156·1996 WL 393568·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36984
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 199695-36191California281 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-36191. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 9, 1996. * Decided July 15, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Terry E. Eyler appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction and sentence for possession of unregistered machine guns and being a felon in possession of a firearm. 3 Eyler contends that his conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause in light of the prior civil forfeiture of his home, computer and collector's bill. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Ursery, No. 95-345, 1996 WL 340815 (U.S. June 24, 1996). 1 AFFIRMED. 2 * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4 ** This disposition is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.