United States v. Rodolfo Flores-Campa

91 F.3d 156 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo FLORES-CAMPA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10192. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 11, 1996. Decided July 10, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Rodolfo Flores-Campa appeals his five-count conviction and sentence on various marijuana trafficking and weapons charges. 1 On appeal, Flores-Campa claims that the police lacked "reasonable suspicion" to conduct an investigatory stop and that all of the evidence derived from the stop should have been suppressed. He also claims that evidence relating to an outstanding charge of unlawful transportation of marijuana was erroneously admitted at trial. Finally, Flores-Campa contends that his sentence should have been adjusted downward because of his minor role in the drug operation and his acceptance of responsibility and because…