United States v. Edward D. Jamison

91 F.3d 156 78 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -5872 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward D. JAMISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50029. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1996. Decided July 24, 1996. Before: GIBSON, * NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward D. Jamison appeals his conviction and sentence for subscribing to false statements on tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1), and structuring transactions to avoid currency reporting requirements in violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 3 Prior to his trial in this case, Jamison, a former Los Angeles County Sheriff's deputy, was tried along with five codefendants for civil rights and theft charges arising out a of a series of incidents in which the defendants allegedly battered criminal suspects, stole their money and property,…