United States v. Michael F. Salyer, United States of America v. Michael F. Salyer, United States of America v. Robert Pastor, United States of America v. Roland Dwight Fisher, III

91 F.3d 157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael F. SALYER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael F. SALYER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert PASTOR, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roland Dwight FISHER, III, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 92-10711, 93-10274 to 93-10276. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Feb. 14, 1996. Submitted March 14, 1996. Decided July 15, 1996. Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Sufficiency of the Evidence. 3 1. To prove the underlying violation of 21 Guam Code Ann. § 63108 , the government was not required to prove that there were no residences before 1974 where the coral was removed. While 21 Guam Code Ann. § 63103 (c) does except from the "Seashore Reserve" "those Villages wherein residences…