United States v. Denise Perlaza-Amparo, United States of America v. Boris Hamed Corrales

91 F.3d 157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Denise PERLAZA-AMPARO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Boris Hamed CORRALES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-50170, 95-50259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these companion cases, Denise Perlaza-Amparo appeals her conviction and sentence and Boris Hamed Corrales appeals his sentence. Pursuant to plea agreements, both Perlaza-Amparo and Corrales pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 * Perlaza-Amparo 4 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Perlaza-Amparo's counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel…