United States v. Remedios Reyes Penaflor

Good Law
91 F.3d 157·1996 WL 405050·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 36891
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 199695-10062California887 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Remedios Reyes PENAFLOR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10062. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 11, 1996. * Decided July 18, 1996. Before: WOOD, ** CANBY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Remedios Reyes Penaflor appeals her conviction and sentence for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 (a), 960(b)(1), and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 * Penaflor argues that the district court abused its discretion in allowing the government to cross-examine her about her divorce petition, income tax returns, birth certificate, and immigration declaration. 1 She claims that they are not prior bad acts, or proper impeachment as they are "extrinsic and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.