United States v. Bobby Ross, United States of America v. Bobby Ross

91 F.3d 157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby ROSS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby ROSS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-15912, 95-16618. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 25, 1996. * Decided June 28, 1996. Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In these consolidated cases, Bobby Ross appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition without leave to amend and its denial of his motion for return of property under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). Ross was sentenced to five years in prison after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine in 1991. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 , 2255, and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the denial of a section 2255 motion. Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451 (9th Cir.1995). Some four years after he pleaded guilty,…