United States v. Antonio Juan Vela, Sr.

91 F.3d 157 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Juan VELA, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10519. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1996. * Decided July 11, 1996. Before: WOOD, ** CANBY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Antonio Juan Vela, Sr., appeals the sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release, on the grounds that the district court failed to apply or consider Sentencing Guidelines Policy Statement 7B1.4, failed to state its reasons for imposing the sentence, and imposed a sentence that is plainly unreasonably. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Vela contends that the district court erred in failing to apply Sentencing Guidelines Policy Statement § 7B1.4. We disagree. This case is controlled by United States v. Plunkett, 74 F.3d 938 (9th Cir.1996), which holds that the district court may rely upon…