Hall

MEMORANDUM **

Robert W. Hall appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against him on his claim that the Bureau of Land Management improperly adopted the Las Vegas Resources Management Plan (RMP). We affirm.

(1) Hall asserts that the BLM failed to properly follow the Federal Land Policy Management Act 1 notice and public participation requirements. See 43 U.S.C. § 1712 (f); 43 C.F.R. § 1610.2 (f). He also asserts that it failed to properly follow the National Environmental Policy Act 2 notice *922 and public participation requirements. See 40 C.F.R. § 1501.7 (a)(1). Because these are procedural attacks, we agree that Hall has standing to raise the issues. He meets the general statutory elements. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 , 112 S.Ct. 2130, 2136 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992); Hall v. Norton, 266 F.3d 969, 975-77 (9th Cir.2001) (Hall I); Cantrell v. City of Long Beach, 241 F.3d 674, 679-80 (9th Cir.2001); Yesler Terrace Cmty. Council v. Cisneros, 37 F.3d 442 , 445^46 (9th Cir.1994). He also meets the special agency action elements. See Hall I, 266 F.3d at 975-76 ; Churchill County v. Babbitt, 150 F.3d 1072, 1080 (9th Cir.), amended by, 158…