Cortez-Quinonez

Cortez-Quinonez v. Ashcroft

Good Law
32 F. App'x 940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 2002No. 00-71662; INS No. A35-897-776California363 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Cortez-Quinonez (“Cortez”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision finding him removable as an aggravated felon under INA § 237(a) (2) (A) (iii) for his prior conviction for false imprisonment. Although 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(C) deprives us of review of the order of removal, we retain jurisdiction “to determine whether jurisdiction exists.” See Flores-Miramontes v. INS, 212 F.3d 1133, 1135-36 (9th Cir.2000) (we have jurisdiction to determine whether a petitioner is an alien removable by reason of having been convicted of one of the enumerated offenses). We deny the petition.

Cortez argues that false imprisonment in violation of California Penal Code §§ 236-37 is not a crime of violence, because “by its nature,” it does not involve a “substantial risk that physical force” may be used in the course of committing the offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 16 ; 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(F). Under section 237, a person can be convicted of false imprisonment by fraud or deceit, as well as by violence or menace. See Cal.Penal Code § 237(b); People v. Rios, 177 Cal.App.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.