Kvartenko

Kvartenko v. Ashcroft

Good Law
33 F. App'x 262
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 2002No. 00-71076; I & NS No. A77 541 647California1,132 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Oleksiy Kvartenko, a citizen of Ukraine, petitions this court to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b). Because the BIA’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, we deny the petition for review.

BACKGROUND

Oleksiy Kvartenko entered the United States at New York City as a nonimmigrant with authorization to remain for a period not to exceed 180 days. Kvartenko did not depart within the allotted period. The INS issued him a Notice to Appear, charging him with removability pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(1)(B), for having remained in the United States beyond the permitted time period.

Kvartenko admitted the allegations contained in the Notice to Appeal* but applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and Torture Convention protection. After an asylum hearing, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Kvartenko’s applications, granted him voluntary departure, and ordered him deported to Ukraine should he fail to depart. Kvartenko…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.